Showing posts with label car. Show all posts
Showing posts with label car. Show all posts

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Get Great Instant Auto Insurance With Nationwide

How to buy instant car insurance online for quick coverage

If you need insurance in a hurry, Nationwide can help. Using our website, you can receive an instant auto insurance quote and purchase it right away. That can be handy in a lot of situations – if you realize your car insurance has lapsed or if you’ve purchased a new vehicle and need coverage ASAP.
Whatever the reason, when you get an online insurance quote from Nationwide, you can tailor and purchase a car insurance policy instantly, and even print out your proof of insurance card. Here’s how it works.

Gather some basic information about your cars and drivers

To speed up purchasing instant auto insurance online, have this basic information ready for each driver on your policy:
  • Social Security number (optional)
  • Driver’s license number
  • Driving distance to work
  • Driving violations, accidents or claims in the last five years (approximate dates and details)
  • Make, model and year of your vehicle.

Get an insurance quote online

Visit nationwide.com, choose your state from the pop-up menu and click Go. Then answer some questions about yourself, the car you want to insure and the people who will be driving the vehicle.

Find the discounts you deserve

As you get your instant quote, Nationwide will help identify discounts on car insurance that might apply to your policy to save you money. Depending on where you live, you may qualify for lower rates when you insure multiple vehicles or have an accident-free record. If your vehicle is equipped with an anti-theft device or passenger restraint system, you may save even more.

Choose the policy that’s right for you

When you receive your instant car insurance quote from Nationwide, you will get three options to choose from, making it easy to select a policy that’s right for you and your budget. You can also change coverage options to create a more personalized policy.

Buy your auto insurance online – instantly

Once you’ve picked a policy, simply choose your payment option to complete the transaction. After that, you can download your proof of insurance card and print it out.

Let Nationwide help

Visit the Auto Insurance Resource Center for more tips and ideas for choosing the car insurance that’s right for you.

Texas Car Insurance Company Launches Online Insurance Comparison Tool to Help Find the Best Car Insurance Quote for FREE

Los Angeles, CA -- (SBWIRE) -- 04/11/2013 -- Texas Car Insurance Company has introduced an online insurance comparison tool on their website Cheap Insurance Online that will enable consumers to find the best car insurance deal from the leading car insurance carriers, offering their insurance coverage to the car owners. A car owner can instantly receive a free quote on the website by just entering the zip code of his or her area. The company maintains that the objective of offering free quote online is to make people aware about the best prices that they can expect to pay for their car’s insurance. The website Cheap Insurance Online searches a number of online insurance carriers before providing with the free quote to a customer. This is the reason why a customer can always rest assured of finding the most affordable insurance deal with them.

The leading Texas Car Insurance Company reveals that the Online Insurance Marketplace is full of a host of service providers, and it’s always difficult for an individual customer to search all of them and get the best deal. They have designed this online tool to help people find the best car insurance deal for a speedy online shopping for an insurance product. They make sure that consumers can be able to pick the best deals and also get the approval as quickly as possible. To make things simple, consumers can also request for their free assistance by phone or via email.

Many consumers, who came to learn about the free online quote tool on Cheap Insurance Online, feel that this will help save them both time and money. One of them happily says, “This is a good use of technology and is a new approach to provide consumers with the most affordable auto insurance schemes.” People feel that because of this innovative approach by Texas Car Insurance, consumers will now prefer to buy auto insurance online, with the kind of affordability and convenience they are going to enjoy.

In the true sense, the company offers consumers the flexibility with which they can now able to compare insurance prices from so many service providers and can choose the insurance options that can best suit their needs. To use their online comparison tool and get a free quote, a consumer can visit the websitehttp://www.cheapinsureonline.com/.

About Cheap Insurance Online
Cheap Insurance Online offers consumers an opportunity to research and compare car insurance deals. All car owners can rest assured that they get the cheapest rates for the auto insurance protection. The online comparison tool has been designed to save money by comparing auto insurance quotes from a number of online insurance providers.

Warner and Blazer, regional ex-soccer executives accused of fraud

PANAMA CITY (AP) — Luxury apartments, a military-style Hummer vehicle and even car insurance for a girlfriend. That’s just part of the lifestyle that former CONCACAF secretary general Chuck Blazer allegedly enjoyed with the regional soccer organization’s money, a report by its ethics and integrity committee says.
Blazer also is accused of violating U.S. and perhaps state and local laws by not having tax returns submitted for the Confederation of North and Central American and Caribbean Football from 2004-10, according to the report released Friday that accuses him and former CONCACAF president Jack Warner of enriching themselves through fraud.
CONCACAF and FIFA, soccer’s world governing body, have not decided what steps to take. But the first political fallout from the report came swiftly.
Soon after the report was released, the leader of Trinidad’s main opposition party said he will seek Warner’s resignation as the island’s national security minister.
Opposition leader Keith Rowley said late Friday that he will present the issue for debate in Parliament next week. “Mr. Warner cannot continue to serve as a minister of government,” Rowley said.
The 113-page report about the activities of Warner and Blazer was presented the CONCACAF congress in Panama City, with FIFA President Sepp Blatter in attendance.
“Our information shows they committed fraud,” committee member David Anthony Cathcart Simmons said. The committee said it based its findings on documents and interviews with dozens of people.
Warner and Blazer have responded to past accusations by denying any wrongdoing.
CONCACAF appointed the investigative committee under the leadership of current President Jeffrey Webb in an effort to get beyond the scandals after Warner and Blazer quit. Simmons said the pair did not cooperate with the investigation.
The 70-year-old Warner resigned as CONCACAF president and his position on FIFA’s executive committee in June 2011 after Blazer accused him and then-Asian confederation head Mohamed bin Hammam of attempting to bribe Caribbean delegates $40,000 each to vote for bin Hammam in the FIFA presidential election. Blazer resigned as CONCACAF’s secretary general in December 2011; his term on FIFA’s executive committee runs until May 30.
Simmons accused Blazer of “misappropriating” at least $15 million by compensating himself with CONCACAF funds without authorization after his last contract expired in July 1998. Simmons alleged that the 67-year-old Blazer, the most senior American official at FIFA for 16 years, also bought apartments with CONCACAF money and failed to have the organization file its tax returns in the U.S., causing it to lose its nonprofit organization tax-exempt status. It said that from 2004-10, CONCACAF and-or its marketing company failed to file returns.
“Blazer went out of his way to avoid engaging the IRS at any level at great expense to CONCACAF,” the report said.
Blazer didn’t respond to an email seeking comment after the report was released. In the past, he attributed money he received to commissions he says were due him for commercial contracts he negotiated.
Warner said late Friday that he had not read the report. “As far as I am aware it is baseless and malicious,” he said in a statement. “I left CONCACAF and turned my back on football two years ago. Since then I have had no interest in any football-related matter.”
Blazer established companies in New York and the Cayman Islands, and his contracts from 1990-98 called for CONCACAF to pay them 10 percent commissions for “sponsorships and TV rights fees” in deals he negotiated, to the U.S. company for the first four years and then to the offshore entity.
The report said that revenue outside the contract’s scope was included in the calculations, including ticket money from the Gold Cup tournament, and that CONCACAF continued to pay commissions after the second deal expired on July 17, 1994 — the day of the World Cup final. The report said Blazer appeared to take a $300,000 commission on a $3 million payment FIFA’s marketing arm made to CONCACAF in 2006 to construct a television studio.
The report claimed Blazer “misappropriated CONCACAF funds to finance his personal lifestyle,” causing the organization to “subsidize rent on his residence in the Trump Tower in New York; purchase apartments at the Mondrian, a luxury hotel and residence in Miami; sign purchase agreements and pay down payments on apartments at the Atlantis resort in the Bahamas.”
It also alleged Blazer used CONCACAF funds to buy a Hummer for his own personal use and pay car insurance, as well as employee health insurance, for himself and his girlfriend.
In addition to Blazer’s administrative and financial dealings, the committee also focused on Warner, who headed CONCACAF from 1990 until 2011.
The committee said it found “fraud” in the management of a training center built in 1995 to help players in the region train and improve their game, Simmons said.
The center, later named in honor of former FIFA president Joao Havelange, was built at Macoya in Warner’s home country of Trinidad and Tobago. Warner at the time was also a FIFA vice president and a member of its executive committee.
“Warner represented to FIFA that funds would be used to support development but never told FIFA that Centre would be situated on land owned by his companies,” Simmons said. One of the companies was named “Renraw” — Warner spelled backwards.
Warner “deceived persons and organizations” into believing the facility was CONCACAF’s and not his, he added. Almost $26 million were invested in that project between 1996-06, with a large portion of the funds donated by FIFA.
Australia’s soccer federation provided $462,200 to upgrade a stadium at the Havelange center around September 2010, according to the report. “The funds, however, were not accounted for in the CONCACAF general ledger or reported as income in its financial statements for 2010,” it added. Instead, the report said the money was deposited into a “comingled” account that included Warner’s personal money.
At the time, Australia was seeking votes in its bid to stage the 2022 World Cup.
“I have recounted a sad and sorry tale in the life of CONCACAF,” Simmons, a former Barbados chief justice, said in a lengthy discourse about the report Friday evening. He called it “a tale of abuse of position and power, by persons who assisted in bringing the organization to profitability but who enriched themselves at the expense of their very own organizations.”


Read more: http://www.voxxi.com/regional-ex-soccer-executives-fraud/#ixzz2R8UB4QId

Your Legal Corner: 'No limitation on lawsuit' auto insurance

Today Your Legal Corner will provide information on the “No Limitation on Lawsuit” auto insurance option.
With our recent tragedies, it seems to me that we all know that not every day is going to be a good day. In fact, on some days we need just to find the will and the strength to get through them.
Getting what you want is neither always easy nor possible. In this instance, payment in advance is required simply to keep a right that should have been yours all along … the right to sue.
No Limitation on Lawsuit Insurance Policy
Under a no limitation on lawsuit policy, you are compensated for all your injuries should you become involved in an automobile accident. You will be compensated by the person who harmed you for your lost wages and for the pain and suffering of you and your family. Under this threshold, you retain your constitutional right to a jury trial if you are injured in a car accident.
NJ.S.A. 39:6A-8
As you may recall from last week, under the lawsuit limitation policy, one may sue only under the following circumstances when involved in a car accident: death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement or scarring, displaced fractures, loss of fetus or permanent injury. Permanent injury is defined as when a body part has not and will not heal to function normally with further treatment and confirmed by diagnostic testing.
What this means is you could be saddled with more than a thousand dollars in medical bills that will not be paid by your own insurance company because they are subject to the deductible and co-payment provision of your policy. And yes, this also means you may not be entitled to receive funds for pain and suffering where the accident is not your fault. This is the result of having a limitation on your rights to sue when involved in an automobile accident.
Problems with Limitation on Lawsuit
The Limitation on Lawsuit costs less from an insurance standpoint. However, if involved in an accident you stand to lose much more. If you want to protect yourself from a negligent driver select the No Limitation on Lawsuit threshold. Don't be fooled by false savings.
The insurance company is not the enemy. However they are a business and, like any business, their goals are profits. Insurance companies have attorneys and adjusters whose goal is to pay you as little as they can. You need a personal injury lawyer who is going to fight for you. If you're involved in an accident, an attorney or law firm who has the knowledge to protect your rights and maximize a settlement can make a huge difference. Without the strength of an experienced personal injury lawyer or firm, you may not receive the true value of your case.
So, review your policy and consult with a law firm experienced in personal injury when involved in an automobile accident to explain your policy and inform you as to your legal entitlements. And remember — try to make each day count even if it doesn't appear to be your best day!
Next week YLC will discuss “Family Leave Act.” Till next time, God bless, keep smiling and remember who's in Your Legal Corner. Victoria M. Dalton is a dedicated Family/Elder Attorney, with the Law Firm of HoffmanDiMuzio. To contact Ms. Dalton for further information call 856-845-8243 or 856-863-8776; email correspondence to vdalton@hdhlaw.com.
Your Legal Corner was created by Victoria M. Dalton, Esquire to provide educational information regarding the law. The content of Your Legal Corner is not and will not replace legal advice.
South Jersey Media Group and nj.com accept no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information in this article.

Problem is car insurance is a must and not retirement savings

Principal Retirement Advisors Pvt. Ltd was set up in India last year after almost 15 years of Principal Financial Group operating as an asset management company here. As retirement advisors, their work model is to largely approach employees through their employers and help them create individual retirement solutions. Their services go beyond investments as they also offer advice related to estate planning and insurance. For this, they charge a fee. Larry D. Zimpleman, chairman, president and chief executive officer, Principal Financial Group, talks to Mint Money about the pension system in India and what challenges the financial sector regulations pose.
In India, you have been operating as an asset management company (AMC), but last year you entered the financial markets as a retirement advisor. Why?
We came to India somewhere in 1998-99. The original premise was that private retirement savings and systems were going to get more and more important around the world. We believe that India needs to create a more robust private retirement system.
Principal’s core strengths are in global asset accumulation and asset management, which is also the reason why we are experts in retirement and pensions and also why we chose to enter India as a pure AMC. But in the 15 years that we have been here, I would say there has been little to no progress in creating a robust private pension system. So as Principal Retirement Advisors, we thought we rather get on with building the platform in anticipation of the government to create the private pension legislation.
Give us some insight into the retirement systems of other markets. Where do you see India in this?
Let me start with a popular description that is used to explain how countries think about this. It’s called the first pillar, second pillar and third pillar approach. The first pillar is essentially government provided, the second pillar is private, often employer-based, and the third pillar is also a private pillar, usually an individual or retail pillar. Different countries use different combinations of these three pillars to arrive at the retirement income. Now the first system was the Chilean system in 1981. It was based on a modest first pillar because they wanted the state to support only those who couldn’t save on their own, they then had a mandatory and somewhat larger second pillar. Since then they have modified the system to continue with the second pillar of mandatory savings and then put a third pillar tax incentivized for both individual or employer based contributions. Now in the US, you have a larger first pillar that may provide for half the retirement income. The second pillar is employer-based and tax incentivized and the third is individual’s voluntary savings and could be tax incentivized. But if you look at Australia or New Zealand, they are extreme in the sense that they have a high required mandatory contribution and very modest first pillar.
A preferred model would be to have a modest first pillar, a more robust second pillar with tax incentives and then the third pillar of individual contribution again with tax incentives.
Coming to India, in the context of the pillars, I would say it has appeared fairly complex because it depends on whether you are a government worker or in the unorganized sector or in the organized sector. But regardless of the complexities, I think it’s not formed well enough to be doing the job it needs to do.
But we now have a National Pension System (NPS) that is being considered by many employers to build that second pillar. But NPS is struggling to penetrate among individuals, the primary reason being lack of incentives to the distributors. But if you look at other products like health or car insurance, it’s increasingly becoming important because there is enough awareness about it.
It’s always been interesting to me that in general insurance, for instance in car insurance, countries have no problem making it mandatory. Even to people it makes sense, but there is nothing that says that if you are working, you need to save for your retirement. That’s a problem. This is also why financial literacy is important. For instance, in the US, we don’t impart financial literacy in schools and then we wonder why people take on too much debt, buy houses they shouldn’t buy and then we have a financial crisis.
The good news is that today there are some very effective, often web-based platforms that can really help people come up the curve of financial literacy. So now if you can answer some basic financial questions, you can put in place a basic financial plan.
Are you interested in becoming a pension fund manager of NPS? Are you looking for a partner?
Of course, we would certainly like to become a pension fund manager; it’s what we have primarily come to India for. In our AMC business, we have a committed partner in Punjab National Bank and we believe that, as things stand, we don’t need to look for new partners as and when the government decides to open up the sector to foreign companies.
Do you recommend NPS to your clients?
We will first recommend that they begin with taking advantage of the tax investments. This will naturally mean that we will recommend investment into the Public Provident Fund (PPF) and National Pension System (NPS). Further, accumulations will then be based on recommendations thrown up by our proprietary retirement planning model. With people’s aspirations and inflation on the ascend, we have no doubt that most of us will have to accumulate beyond the mandatory and tax-driven savings.
However, what needs to be appreciated is that most people need to be coached into recognizing and quantifying their goals in a manner relative to their future income stream. We also recognize that as one progresses these plans need to be reviewed to cater to changing goals, needs and incomes. We will also assist our clients with planning post-retirement payouts and risk management like getting optimum insurance covers, drafting a will and so on.
Post 2008, we have seen some tightening of regulations the world over. While regulators in many parts of the world keep a closer watch on market practice, regulation in India have focused on transforming the products. How do you see such reforms?
I think the regulators need to focus on transparency and disclosures and not control market practice. If you look at the US, there is no lack of transparency. There is far too much detail on every component of a mutual fund. The prospectus that comes along is so thick that it’s meaningless to the average investor. There is certainly no lack of transparency but whether they read it or understand it is a different issue. The need really is to simplify things. Probably have a two-page disclosure report that has all the relevant information. In India, I believe the scheme information document (SID) is aimed at doing exactly that.
But what is happening right now is that we see the regulators controlling the market practice. For instance, how much commission you can get, where you can sell, can the product be front-ended? Regulators should focus on transparency and disclosures and market practice will take care of itself. An informed customer will be the best regulator of market practice.
But for a layman who doesn’t understand financial products, shouldn’t there be some control on market practice?
I would challenge a little bit the notion that companies are out there to missell. I don’t know a company that’s not pro-consumer. I am not saying that this has never happened but those companies are not going to be around for a long time.
How do you view the recent regulatory reforms in India?
The weight of regulatory community in recent times has been towards the more extreme end of the continuum. In India, it has not been as much about the changes in regulation as it has been about their pace; making it, relatively speaking, more involved and challenging. But then individual regulators go back and forth and depending again on who is in power or what kind of constituency they represent can often have a big impact too. We see that in the US. So with President Obama we sense there is a leaning towards pro-consumers regulatory reforms. Typically, when Republicans are more in control like in the case of the Bush-II (regime), it was felt there wasn’t a very heavy regulatory hand which, it is argued, could be a part of the financial crisis.
India is now contemplating adopting a single regulator model. What are your views?
What I find interesting is that different regulator model is held as the regulatory model of the day and then it changes over time so it seems like in most cases it develops with functional regulation (multiple regulators). Then there are few countries for instance Canada is an example, United Kingdom, UK, was an example Japan is an example that a number of years ago went for a single regulator.
Then you find that they kind of become super regulators and often then what happens is that they become bit of a bureaucracy unto themselves and they become so powerful that it begins to concern the government and the private sector certainly I think that’s true of FSA in UK and FSA in Japan. So to me all of this is like a pendulum, it swings one way and then it swings back the other way.
But if you look at what happened in the United States it’s interesting. Post the financial crisis we stayed with multiple regulators but in order to make them talk to each other we have a Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) and so the purpose of FSOC is make functional regulators talk to each other and not be a super regulator. What they intend to do is make regulators including the state regulators meet at least once a quarter and at least talk to each other. There is a specific mandate within FSOC to look for bubbles that might be developing in the economy. It’s a kind of a balance between functional regulator and super regulator, whether that works is yet to be determined.

Louisiana has nation's highest auto insurance rates - again

Louisiana's auto insurance rates remain the highest in the nation, according to industry studies.
A March report from Insure.com, an insurance industry website, shows Louisiana's average auto insurance rates at $2,699 annually, followed by Michigan at $2,520 and Georgia at $2,155.
By comparison, the national average for car insurance premiums in the U.S. is a little more than $1,500.
This is the third year in a row Louisiana tops the list. Before 2011 it held the No. 2 spot for years, industry reports show.
Maine enjoys the least expensive car insurance rates, at $934 per year, followed by Iowa, $1,028.
A variety of factors dictate how costly auto insurance will be state by state, the report says. Such as the number of insurers competing for business, driving conditions, the portion of uninsured drivers and the way state insurance systems are set up.
Compared to the rest of the country, the study notes that Louisiana drivers who get in wrecks file more injury claims than motorists in other states.
Louisiana also has a high rate of natural disaster damage.
Blue Bunol, general manager for ABC Insurance, a local auto insurance agency with 62 locations throughout Louisiana and Texas, said the litigious nature of people in the state make it difficult for insurance companies to keep costs low.
Louisiana faces issues with high insurance costs because of poor roads and natural disasters, Bunol said. But it's also the personal injury lawyers who advertise heavily on television and on bus stop benches, and the state's direct-action law, which allows people to sue insurers directly.
Louisiana is ranked 13th in the country for attorneys per capita, with 11.1 lawyers per 10,000 residents, according to AveryIndex.com, a law and rankings website.
The state's relatively poor population sees this aggressive advertising, Bunol said, many of which (about 13 percent) don't have car insurance and are more inclined to wring whatever they can out of an insurance policy.
“Attorney advertisement entices people who are looking for a handout to call whether their accident warrants it or not,” he said. “Then the attorneys build a claim around nothing. Many of these claims are turning into a feeding frenzy.”
Louisiana has the highest frequency of bodily injury claims, according to a report by the Insurance Research Council.
Bunol said drivers can still get good deals if they rely more on insurers, like ABC, who offer mixed packages that drive competition.
He also noted that high car insurance rates are not necessarily statewide. The highest rates are largely concentrated in the New Orleans metropolitan area.
For example, a 21-year-old male with a clean driving record who drives a 2005 Toyota Corolla pays $246.05 per month for basic insurance in New Orleans, according to ABC quotes. Using that same sample, the monthly cost would be only $176.54 in Houma.
Bunol said another factor that contributes to the high costs is the high level of alcohol consumption in Louisiana.
“You don't have many states where you can drive though a daiquiri place and get a highball and a beer to go,” he said.
Deplorable road conditions, as a result of the soft nature of the soil, contribute to the costs as well, he said.
“So you got poor streets and more people drinking and driving — yeah, that's going to increase the frequency of claims.”
Melissa Landry, director of Louisiana Lawsuit Abuse Watch, a nonprofit judicial-reform organization based in Baton Rouge, said a unique law in Louisiana, which dictates that civil claims under $50,000 must be decided by a judge, not a jury, is unfair to residents and insurance companies.
It puts more power into the hands of elected judges, Landry alleges. And that may encourage some contingency fee attorneys who make a living based on court outcomes to seek out judges who have a track record of siding with plaintiffs — the people living in the communities they serve — more than insurers they sue.
While Landry does not want to paint the judiciary with a broad brush, she said it's clear that money contributed to judicial elections may at times add an element of political pressure that juries don't experience.
“In recent analysis of civil jury trial threshold limits for all 50 states, Louisiana Lawsuit Abuse Watch found that the vast majority of states have no threshold for civil jury trials, and among 14 states that do, Louisiana's threshold is by far the highest in the nation,” Landry said. “At $50,000, Louisiana's jury trial threshold is roughly more than 28 times the national average of $1,742.40.”
The $50,000 threshold was enacted during the last administration of former Gov. Edwin Edwards in 1993 in an effort by legislators to prevent overburdening the courts with more bureaucracy and increased government spending for assembling juries and other costs.
In various reports, legislators have said people who come for jury duty do not want to waste time for minor traffic claims. And if the trial threshold were to be lowered, even more civil jury trials will take place, which will create longer delays in an already backed-up judiciary system.
“It is unfair to ask the citizens of Louisiana to serve on juries for small claims that can be effectively and efficiently handled by judges — and have been for years,” Michael L. Barras, a personal injury attorney in New Iberia, wrote on his website.
Bunol said the truth is insurance companies don't really care how high the rates go nor do legislators because it all evens out in the end.
“They look at it as another form of welfare,” Bunol said. “Instead of tax dollars distributed as welfare, it's insurance dollars that are simply paid by the public anyway — same as tax dollars. Insurance companies are going to pay the claim and ultimately change their rate accordingly. But all of us who pay high insurance rates should be screaming at the legislators to make stiffer laws to keep these attorneys from being able to build up a claim that should have never existed in the first place.”

Cheap Auto Insurance Quotes Now Available New

According to the 2012 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) report, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, Louisiana, New York and Florida are the five most expensive states for automobile insurance. The report also found that “high premium states tend also to be highly urban, with higher wage and price levels and greater traffic density.”

“Even a few hundred dollars can make a difference,” says Maria Acevada, an Auto Insurance HQ company spokesperson. “Our new online tool helps drivers find the cheapest rates in their immediate area.” 

Finding the cheapest auto insurance rate isn’t always straightforward. Final rates are based on a number of factors, including age, history of loss, traffic tickets, location, occupation, military or marital status, history of homeownership, and more. “The average consumer compares three quotes before making a decision on an insurance policy,” Acevada continues. “Our system makes it easy to comparison shop, without having to meet face-to-face with several different companies.”

Drivers looking for a cheap auto insurance quote can visit the company website (http://autoinsurancehq.org/), and key a few pieces of information to start a search. Based on zip code, the quoting tool returns a listing of local, available carriers and average annual savings. 

To receive a cheap auto insurance quote or to find out more about auto insurance, visit the Auto Insurance HQ company website. 

About Auto Insurance HQ
Auto Insurance HQ is an online brokerage firm that offers drivers an instant way to receive cheap auto insurance quotes, 24 hours a day.